reaction - Internet and democracy in Morocco: A force for change and an instrument for repression
This
article by Dr. Bouziane explores the dynamics of internet use in Morocco and
how it is linked with democratization in the country.
After the
start of the process of democratization in Morocco in 1997, led by the election
of a socialist party, there was hope for more freedom of the press, which until
then had been particularly authoritarian and reflected the very oppressive
nature of the regime at the time.
However, it
was soon clear that despite reforms, the media was still under strict state
pressure and regulations.
The
Internet appeared then for Moroccans as a public sphere where they could
practice their right to free speech with as little government interference as
possible. Morocco’s government has generally avoided using tactics used by
other authoritarian regimes to limit content on the Internet, such as banning social
media platforms. But there are rare exceptions, the infamous banning of Lakome being one of them.
Even though
internet use is technically limited due to the high illiteracy rates and
inaccessibility in non-urban parts of the country, Morocco still enjoys a fairly
high internet usage rate, and it is steadily increasing. For example, the internet
penetration rate in the country grew from around 21 percent in 2007 to 56.8
percent in 2014.
The
Internet as used by Moroccans as a platform for advocating change has proven to
be successful on numerous occasions, including the February 20 movement that
started on Facebook and eventually pressured the government into making a
series of reforms. Other successful instances include the withdrawal of Daniel
Galvan’s pardon or Amina Filali’s case.
But despite
this, the Internet in Morocco is far from being the democratic answer to the
problem of authoritarianism in the country. In fact, the Internet is still
heavily regulated and surveilled by the Moroccan authorities and has not spared
activists from being punished. An example is Ali Anouzla, the founder of the
previously-mentioned Lakome, who was arrested on terrorism charges that had, in
my opinion, utterly ridiculous justifications. Although it might never be
proved, this is more than likely a direct consequence of the fact that he was
the one to first expose the Daniel Galvan story a month earlier.
It’s true
that as far as media use in Morocco, there is a clear distinction between the
internet and the rest of the “traditional” media platforms. While the latter
are often directly controlled and regulated by the state, the Internet is
rather watched than controlled. But this does not mean that Internet use in
Morocco is safe. The fact that there is even the slightest risk of
repercussions due to simply sharing an opinion means that Internet in Morocco is
not in any way democratic.
Bouziane, Zaid. “Internet and democracy in Morocco: A force for change and
an instrument for repression”. Media
and Democratization: Global Media and Communication. 2016. P.1-18. Web.
Commentaires
Enregistrer un commentaire